Prisoners: an edge-of-your-seat crime drama


Good lord. It’s been weeks since I went to see a movie. I think I was starting to have withdrawals. I’ve been so focused on Halloween movies and TV premieres that I’m afraid I’ve been neglecting my duty as a theater-goer. But now I make my triumphant return to film reviews with Prisoners—a great one to return with, I think. Also my first truly dramatic film, if I’m not mistaken. Here’s hoping I can do it justice. Ok. Shaking off the rust. Film review. Here we go.

I was intrigued by Prisoners from the get-go, assuming I would definitely catch the film at some point, but perhaps waiting for it to make its way to the cheap theater or to come out on DVD. Then, all of the fantastic reviews started surfacing. The positive buzz seemed to suggest that this was one of the best dramas of the year. Naturally, my curiosity spiked. So I caught a matinee showing, and I can now confirm it: this is a superb, gripping film. The running time may be a little daunting (it’s about two-and-a-half hours), but don’t let that scare you away. With excellent performances, a grimly intriguing story, and a perfect ending, Prisoners is worth every minute of your time.

Synopsis: “When Keller Dover’s daughter and her friend go missing, he takes matters into his own hands as the police pursue multiple leads and the pressure mounts. But just how far will this desperate father go to protect his family?” Borrowed from my favorite movie site, IMDb.

The Good: SO MUCH. It’s rare that I get this revved up about a drama, but Prisoners is truly that great. First of all, the story is phenomenal—dark and somber without weighing the audience down too much. Awful things happen, but most of it is suggested rather than shown, which I think makes the things we get to see much more powerful. The tension is high from the moment the little girls disappear, and there are so many twists and turns in the plot that we rarely get a break from that edge-of-your-seat feeling. There are even a few shocking touches of weird in the film that make us stare and squirm at the same time. And this grim, thrilling story is brought to stark life by the characters within it—particularly in regards to Keller Dover (Hugh Jackman) and Detective Loki (Jake Gyllenhaal). As grief-stricken Keller, Jackman flexes his dramatic muscles, proving once again that he’s much more than a wise-cracking, adamantium-clawed mutant (for my non-geeks: that was an X-Men reference). We’re rooting for Keller the whole way through, of course, but we’re also slightly repulsed by the lengths he’s willing to go. Then there’s Gyllenhaal’s solemn, almost overly dedicated Detective Loki. I’ve seen Gyllenhaal in dramatic roles before, of course, but this was definitely one of his best performances. His dedication is admirable, his keen mind undeniable, and his people skills often lackluster. He makes for a fascinating character. All of these factors make Prisoners an engrossing drama/thriller/mystery with a bit of an ethical exploration attached. It’s pretty brilliant stuff. Favorite scene: I’d have to say the very last minute of the film. It sort of leaves you hanging, but in an oddly satisfying way.

The Bad: Honestly, there’s very little I have to say in regards to the negatives. Some people might point out the film’s length, but I was so absorbed by the story that I didn’t mind it. I will say, though, that there are lots of squirmy moments throughout. Violence is rarely shown, but torture does come into play at a few points. Plus, there is, of course, the horrifying elephant in the room: what exactly has happened to the children? It’s grisly enough imagining what happens to abducted adults, but the idea of abducted children raises the stakes to a higher level. If these story elements make you nervous, you might want to sit this one out. However, if you’re a regular viewer of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit or anything comparable, you’ve probably got nothing to worry about. Other than that, I will admit that I have a few qualms with the plot—pretty much exclusively with some of the people involved in abducting the girls. Not many details are given as to why one character in particular feels the need to abduct the girls, and I would really like to delve more into that. Also, there’s another character who clearly has something to do with the abduction, but I have no how or why this person got involved. But these are minor complaints that certainly don’t lessen power of the film. Least favorite scene: That character I mentioned above—the one whose need to abduct children remains a mystery? This person monologues toward the end of the film, and it’s the only point, I believe, that feels kind of forced. It’s not exactly bad, but it could’ve been better.

To Sum It Up: Prisoners is an intense crime drama that I believe could please just about anybody. It’s well-written, well-performed, and very interesting. If you’re someone who goes to the theater purely for fun and fluff, hey, no shame—I’ve seen more than my share of popcorn flicks. But if you see a drama this year, make it Prisoners. I doubt you’ll regret it.

My Grade: A

17 thoughts on “Prisoners: an edge-of-your-seat crime drama

  1. Yay, I’m so glad you went to see this! I loved the way the editing was done for this film, and thoughI found that if I took myself out of the story for a few minutes, part of it (dealing with Paul Dano) was solvable. However, the ending fifteen minutes or so really surprised me.
    Also, please tell me “Gravity” is next on your list (if possible, I know ticket prices can be a pain). I plan on seeing it tomorrow!
    Can’t wait to see more from you!

    • Yeah there were definitely some solvable bits, but the story was compelling enough that I didn’t mind so much. Loved it. You, my friend, were spot on for recommending it. And Gravity is SO next on my list. As a matter of fact, I’m hoping to catch it this weekend. Let me know what you think of it! I feel like I’m going to love it.

    • Thanks! I agree that it did get slightly weak toward the end. Didn’t completely love the reveal of the mastermind behind the kidnapping, but I still thought the film as a whole was great.

  2. Oh yes – I’d meant to read your review sooner but then got mega busy. Sorry! Well, you definitely did enjoy it more than I did. 😉 I think I was being a little overly picky, though. I mainly just wanted further character development, especially for Gyllenhaal. There were just so many unexplained things about his character. And, yes – the kidnapper(s) too – we never really find out what the point was of it all…

    • Yeah I see where you’re coming from. Det. Loki is an interesting guy, and it definitely wouldn’t have hurt to explore that. And it doesn’t delve much into the “why” of the plot either. I just enjoyed it too much to give it anything less than an A! Haha.

  3. Great review for a great movie lady! I absolutely loved this one! There was so much going on but it was amazing and it was carried by some really strong performances from both Gyllenhaal and Jackman, though it is not always an easy movie. Worth every second!

    • Could not agree more, Zoe. I hate that so many people already seem to have forgotten about this one because it’s really great. Glad you’re a fan, too! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s