Maleficent: does Jolie’s magic save a mediocre movie?

maleficent

I’m not sure why, but this film struck me as one I wanted to check out almost as soon as I caught the first trailer. It’s weird though—Sleeping Beauty is one of my least favorite Disney cartoons (because let’s be real: Princess Aurora is kind of useless), and I’ve never really cared one way or the other about Angelina Jolie. Nonetheless, Maleficent found its way onto my 20 Films of 2014 list, and I made a point to go see it opening weekend.

But I did go in with reservations. I find this recent trend of retelling classic cartoon fairy tales as epic live-action films a little annoying. Alice in Wonderland, Snow White and the Huntsman, and now here we are with Maleficent—not to mention next year’s live-action Cinderella. Given that Alice in Wonderland and Snow White and the Huntsman met with generally “meh” (if not altogether bad) reviews, I knew there was a significant chance that Maleficent could make the same kinds of mistakes. And, yes, sadly, it does have similar flaws. Fortunately, a stellar performance from Jolie, breathtaking visuals, and a few twists from the original story are enough to salvage the film.

Synopsis: “A vindictive fairy is driven to curse an infant princess only to realize the child may be the only one who can restore peace.” Borrowed from my favorite movie site, IMDb.

maleficent 2

The Good: I’ll say it again: Angelina Jolie. It’s like the woman was born to play this character. First of all, she looks the part to a tee, and she is absolutely gorgeous. I mean, those eyes! Those cheekbones! Those red, red lips! Fierce, beautiful, and exactly what you’d expect to see from a live-action version of one of Disney’s best lady villains. But Jolie captures much more than the look. She understands every layer to this character, and she expertly brings her to life. She’s wonderfully cheeky, and she has a deep capacity for love, but buried underneath that you can sense the rage and sadness that Jolie coveys well. Nothing about her ever feels forced or over-the-top (which I can’t say about some of the other characters, but we’ll get to that later). Maleficent is the strongest and most interesting character in the film by far. And her character is made all the more interesting by a few additions/twists to the original story that give her depth. We get to see how she became the infamous villain we know so well, and we also get to see the evolution of her relationship with Aurora (Elle Fanning), which is all but nonexistent in the cartoon. But I won’t spoil that. I will only say that you can gauge Maleficent’s feelings toward Aurora by excellent use of the word “beastie.” As for Aurora, I will say that I don’t think she gets as much time to shine as she should, but Fanning’s frequent, joyful smiles and youthful energy make her into a likeable enough character. And in true Disney form, the visuals for this film are spectacular. Any time Maleficent uses her powers, takes flight, or explores her magical forest home, it is a feast for the eyes.

Favorite scene: Maleficent brings Aurora to the forest for the first time, where we encounter lush plant life, sparkling waters, and brightly lit fairies. Gotta hand it to Disney—they do understand the power of good visuals.

maleficent 3

The Bad: Remember those not-so-great characters I alluded to above? Yeah. King Stefan (Sharlto Copley) is one of them. And I’m not sure quite who to blame for that. The casting director for casting Copley, who doesn’t seem right for the part? Copley for playing Stefan so over-the-top? The writers for writing him as over-the-top? Or maybe all of them are to blame. Whatever the case, Stefan simply doesn’t work. You don’t understand his lust for power or his descent into craziness, and you certainly don’t empathize with him. By the end of the film, he is such a one-dimensional, wrathful character that I was rolling my eyes. There’s a great deal of potential to develop a complex, interesting relationship between Stefan and Maleficent, but all attempts to flesh out that bond are over before they’ve even begun. Also, I hated the fairies. Right, Table 9 Mutant (see her review here)? In the cartoon, I remember them as sweet, bumbling, bickering characters who dearly love Aurora, yet this film decided to keep only the “bumbling” and “bickering” bits. They are essentially The Three Stooges in female fairy forms, and their interactions with Aurora suggest severe child neglect. The latter bit is supposed to come off as humorous, but is it not the tiniest bit unsettling that Disney is playing child neglect for laughs? If that isn’t bad enough, they also completely freak me out when they are in fairy form (their heads are way too big for their bodies), and don’t even get me started on the one with blue hair (because whyyyyy?!). Other things to consider: generally cringeworthy dialogue, a rushed ending with several loose threads, and a severely creepy version of “Once Upon a Dream” during the closing credits. Needless to say, some of these factors might leave you more than a little dissatisfied.

Least favorite scene: Basically anything involving Stefan. Yes, he’s that bad.

To Sum It Up: For all its faults, this film actually could’ve been much worse. The visuals really are stunning, and I can’t praise Jolie’s performance enough. For Disney/Sleeping Beauty/Jolie fans or even folks who are very enthusiastic about visual effects, it might be worth a matinee ticket. But if you don’t fall into one of those categories and/or you’re on the fence about this film, I’d say just wait for the DVD.

My Grade: B-

Advertisements

51 thoughts on “Maleficent: does Jolie’s magic save a mediocre movie?

  1. Great review, Cara. I pretty much agree with everything you said. I would add to the good Sam Riley as Diaval. Like everyone who wasn’t Jolie, he didn’t have a lot of screen time but I thought he did well when we did see him.

    • Yeah I didn’t mention Diaval, did I? I agree–more of him would’ve been nice because he’s such an interesting character. I even thought maybe he was going to have some kind of romantic thing going on with either Aurora or Maleficent…

  2. Haven’t seen this yet but having glimpsed at the posters and trailers it appears that Jolie absolutely looks the part. A shame that the rest of the film can’t quite keep up! Great work Cara.

    Adam.

  3. I agree with you I don’t know what it is about these fairy tale movies, they just don’t seem to do it for me in movie form. Maybe it is because we know the story well and have higher expectations or something about these stories just doesn’t translate well. Any who… good review, love hearing your thoughts as always.

  4. Okay – WordPress is allowing me to comment on SOME blogs now (still can’t on Eric’s. Honest to god – I think he won’t believe me! Lol! But it’s true…) ; ) I already said it on Twitter so, again – Great review & agree on all points! Goddamn fairies… Lol

  5. I am actually looking forward to seeing this. I love anything with Angelina Jolie in it. I think she is a brilliant actress who has the ability to bring out the various nuances of her characters.

    In the previews, I wasn’t impressed with Shalto. I loved him in The A-Team, and District 9, but there just didn’t seem a real connection with him and the character even in the previews.

    Thanks for the great review!

    • Happy to oblige, lady! I hope you like it! Jolie is by far the best thing about it. Yeah, I like Copley in the stuff I’ve seen him in, but this…just not a good fit.

  6. Reblogged this on Silver Screen Serenade and commented:

    One more Oscar nom reblog before I call it a night! This one is all about Disney’s live-action twist on Sleeping Beauty, Maleficent, which is nominated for Best Achievement in Costume Design. As a matter of fact, the costumes, effects, and Jolie are pretty much the only parts of the film that are above average…but you can read more about that in the review. 😉

  7. I TOTALLY agree about the fairies. They were, I’m sorry to say, just bloody creepy. Something about the way their features were rendered, too. I’m not sure I’d want them safeguarding my child to be honest.

    Jolie was great in this. I was expecting more from the film overall, because Maleficent was always one of my all-time favourite Disney villains (her and Ursula), but I definitely enjoyed it. Lovely review!

    • Right??? The fairies were just really poorly done. Not sure who gave the final thumbs up on that, but ugh. Jolie was the best thing about the film for sure. They did a great job with her character, but everything else was just…meh. I agree–Maleficent and Ursula are TOTES two of the best Disney villains.

      It’s so good to have you around again!! 🙂

      • Thanks dearest, tis good to be back! I’ve a lot of reading to do, so expect some comment spam over the next few days. I’ll start with your Oscar reposts though!

        How effortlessly cool is Ursula? She is responsible for one of my fav Disney songs, too. “Never underestimate the powah of… BODY LANGUAGE!” I didn’t know what it meant back then when I was all Disney innocent.

        • I will gladly accept all the comment spam from you in the world, Miss V!!! 🙂

          LOL. Oh, Disney, slyly trying to corrupt young minds…Ursula is a total BAMF. Hmm. Actually I was just thinking–if they ever did a live-action version of Little Mermaid (which seems to be the way all of their cartoons are heading), who the hell could pull all that sass off??

        • Ooh, that’s a good one! I’ll have to think on it. This may sound a little weird, but some awesomely beautiful drag queen comes to mind for Ursula’s sass! For the voice, something along the lines of an Alison Moyet.

  8. Great take on it. I am not a fan as it was my least favorite of 2014 but I think original Sleeping Beauty is a masterpiece. I despise what they did to the fairies and turning Maleficent into a victim and the hero…Groan. i didn’t even think it looked that good. I’ve seen that kind of world a million times. Now we get a CGI Lumiere coming and a part of my heart will die.

    • Thanks! Sounds like I enjoyed it a bit more than you did, huh? Lol. I see where you’re coming from though. It’s far, far from being a perfect film. For me, Jolie is its saving grace. I’m actually holding out hope for Beauty and the Beast though. Great cast so far. Fingers crossed they’ll learn from the mistakes of their other cartoon-turned-live-action films…

      • I dont see why they would when what they’ve been doing has made so much money at box office. I think it will be more of the same I’m afraid.
        Jolie is fine. I see why people liked it but it made me upset. Just too tied to original. I see what you are saying as finding some things to like. The whole fairytale retelling just isnt my genre. Oh well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s